No individual who is a member, partner, shareholder or consultant of, in or to any constituent part of That.Legal LLC accepts or assumes responsibility, or has any liability, to any person in respect of this article. petite wedding dresses uk / mens beach wedding attire shorts / mens beach wedding attire shorts It is hard to tell whether the emphasis represented counsels excitement or outrage, but such emphasis is not necessary in pleadings. Mini-crisis averted. In summary, even if the Court decides that Rachels correspondence and/or her diary entries are confidential information, it can require that these confidential documents be protected. I guess its true that opposites attract! Here the counterparty may not be given access to these confidential documents so safeguard the disclosing partys rights, while balancing against the necessity for full and frank disclosure of litigation. By a combination of Instagram-speak and the utter failure of counsel to translate that into English, (Ms Wongs) statement of claim is filled with chaff.. A post shared by Singapore Wedding Gown Rental (@bridefullyyours). Discovery is the formal process where parties exchange relevant documents in preparation for trial. If you need a quick catch-up on whats been going on, you can read about it here. S'pore influencer Rachel Wong ordered by High Court to share Ms Wong appealed this ruling for specific discovery to the High Court. Ms Wu alleged that the influencer was unfaithful to her ex-husband national footballer Anders Aplin. That, I suppose, entitles her, in her estimation, to be a celebrity. Both my friends really did send some photos and my manager even replied with the choices by saying, Client wants you to bring this and this. Were adventurous, we love exploring, and we love new experiences! Top images by @rachelwongggg on Instagram. Anders was part of the Singapore Sports School's inaugural cohort of footballers and moved on to the National Football Academy under-18s. Ms Wong in a statement released through her lawyer said that while she was "disappointed with the outcome", she planned to continue with the lawsuit as a way to "stand up for people who have been the subject of online abuse, harassment and defamation". anders and rachel wedding. Rachel Wong, 25, Actress and Talent, and Anders Aplin, 28, Professional Footballer, got to know each other during a diving trip to Tioman where they both got their license. Several users pointed out how easy it is to sense the judges frustration at having to deal with such a case. As for the gym trainer, Ms Wu alleged that he engaged in intimate and sexual conversations with Ms Wong through text messages on Telegram when she was dating Mr Aplin. anders and rachel wedding - watchformulaone.com For Jacelyn Phang, 27, Professional Model at The. Ms Wong then sued Ms Wu for defamationMs Wongs lawyer Mr Akesh Abhilash from Harry Elias Partnership told The Straits Times. These messages did not show their recipient. She said that she had fully intended to marry him leading up to the wedding. I have followed the general wedding reception order of events with thanks and acknowledgments to the wedding party. In such a case, ones counterparty would have sight of the documents but not the public. Mr Han was Wong's gym trainer, while Mr Wan was the emcee at her and Aplin's wedding. Both of them had dated each other for six years after getting to know each other at Nanyang Technological University, and decided to tie the knot on 27 December 2019. Allura siding problems rachel wong anders aplin wedding emcee. The plaintiff describes herself as a full-time social media influencer, actress, model and host. She was promiscuous. The marriage was legally annulled around March 2021, according to lawnet. According to Wu, Wong had apparently been intimate with at least two individuals, namely: A post shared by Rachel Wong (@rachelwongggg). But then I made eye contact with someone and I realised, it was a friend! Privacy policy. So everything started when Rachel Wong a 27-year-old influencer who has over 42800 followers on Instagram had her marriage annulled sometime back in March 2020. Rachel Wong and Anders Aplin's Free-Spirited Pre-Wedding Shoot QIGI Real Estate - Ron Costa (S.60336) best wedding website; alexa and carlos penavega wedding; wedding traditions scotland Ultimately though, the paramount consideration in an application for specific discovery is whether, taking all issues into account, the specified document or class of documents could be used at trial by one party or the other what the judge refers to as the broader relevancy test. 7 tips to being a memorable wedding MC - LinkedIn Your job is not to bring up rambling anecdotes throughout the evening and to tell a story or a joke before and after each speaker. sharon tate wedding date. Wong Sues Wu For Defamation. The Videographer: Highest Kite Weddings. With 2 goals to his name, Anders would want to bring his current form into the new season! View this post on Instagram A post shared by Singapore Wedding Gown Rental bridefullyyours. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Singapore . S'pore influencer Rachel Wong ordered by High Court to share I was already so rigid, skeptical, and timid. My family consists of my wife, Siok Choo and my three sons: Anders, Christer, Niels, and myself. Wong's diary entries allegedly implicating Mr Wan from Jun 2018 to Jun 2020. Anders Aplin continues with the Cheetahs! A post shared by Singapore Wedding Gown Rental (@bridefullyyours). She is seeking damages of S$150,000 including aggravated damages. Anders was part of the Singapore Sports School's inaugural cohort of footballers and moved on to the National Football Academy under-18s. Pin On Pre Wedding Photoshoot Outdoor . Stating that the narrative they presented is not clear, he wrote. Justice Choo Han Teck upheld District Judge Victor Yeos decision in the High Court. Anders and I are very spontaneous people and we try to live in the moment whenever we can. Relationship with Anders Aplin. The Registrar examined the exhibited diary entry and concluded that it provided details of Rachels then-fledgling feelings for Alan. Defamation suit: Influencer Rachel Wong fails in bid to find woman who Rachel and Aaron's Intimate and Unplugged Wedding at Maison Miaja She had caused more than one person's life to be ruined. Some more multiple guys. This was him wanting to chase his dreams and do what hes passionate about, which was something that I didnt have the courage to do, back then. In this case, samples of relevant material had been produced, and, to extend the fishing analogy just a bit more, it is not a mere fishing expedition if fish has in fact been spotted, Justice Choo added. Intellectual Property Lawyers | Let's talk about your challenge. [ADV] IT SHOW 2023 - SGs Largest IT Fair is back 912 March at Suntec Lvl 3&4! "From the exhibits that the defendant has produced, there is reason to believe that similar other entries may be found, and if the diaries are produced but no such entries are found, then surely that should strengthen the plaintiffs case at trial, he added. Posted on 7 junio 2022 by. Further, the trial judge may draw an adverse inference against the party failing to obey the order. On Tuesday (28 Jun), High Court judge Choo Han Teck dismissed Wongs appeal. So I turned and I saw him standing there holding a bouquet of flowers, at the end of the carpet that was laid out, with a floral arch behind him. The confusing part is why Rachel will go cheat on this guy.. Rachel: The shoot with Bridefully Yours was amazing and Im so thankful for this opportunity. In 2009 he was part of. Rachel Wong x Oliva Wu Defamation Case - that.legal Even though it was a loan move to Matsumoto Yamaga F.C, the deal caught my attention primarily because Anders Aplin was not a household name. In support of his application for discovery, Ms Wus lawyer Gerard Quek had submitted photocopies of text messages depicting lurid details from a man who was ostensibly named Chen Xuan Han, the judge further noted. Notably, Rachel swore on affidavit that there were no other diary entries relating to [Alan] and that she was not in possession of any correspondence between her and Alan, because of her habit of consistently deleting old text messages and photographs to free up memory space. Rachel, dissatisfied with the outcome, had appealed a second time to the High Court. However, the diary entry exhibited in Wu's defence (dated Jan. 6) provided some details of Wongs "then-fledgling feelings" for Wan. The couple spurred each other to live their dreams, and celebrated their love with a beautiful and different pre-wedding shoot at the ArtScience Museum, and at East Coast Park with their dog. Hopefully, the trial will shed light on the truth once and for all, and everyone involved can properly move on with their lives. Trial dates for the case have not been set yet. Ms Wu alleged that the influencer was unfaithful to her ex-husband national footballer Anders Aplin. By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis. That was how Anders and I first spoke to each other. Photo by Rachel Wongs Instagram page. Wong confirmed on affidavit that she did not have any correspondence with Han, nor had diary entries relating to Wan, except for the entry she had shown in her defence. Masking up when one's feeling unwell is still recommended. Olivia, in her defence, claims that her Stories are not defamatory because they are true in substance in other words, that Rachel was indeed unfaithful to Anders. I actually did go through the shoot for a good 20 minutes until one of the scenes where I had to be blindfolded and brought out to the garden where the blindfold will be removed. I had heard of Bridefully Yours prior to this shoot and saw that they had lots of gorgeous gowns! Post author: Post published: 21.08.2022 Post category: carousel house wedding Post comments: affordable french chateau wedding affordable french chateau wedding Ms Wu further asserted that Ms Wong had sex with Mr Wan on her wedding night. rachel wong anders aplin wedding emcee. In the present case, the District Court held that Olivias application was not a fishing expedition because these documents would be relevant in establishing whether the substance or gist of the Stories was true and may adversely affect Rachels case or support Olivias case for justification.