0000133450 00000 n
And that is why elections matter. Here the Supreme Court has chosen to stand on slippery political ground, for it has had to justify a judicial veto of arrangements approved by popular referendum. NO one will deny that cities and suburbs have problems of their own; but metropolitan areas have the resources to help themselves if only they would set their minds to it. Following Baker v. Carr, counties were not entitled to have a legislator. 0000001336 00000 n
For if a minority can rule in one House of a bicameral legislature, then it could veto the acts of its sister chamber and exact concessions on behalf of the special interests it represents. Last week, the current court said pretty much the opposite: That partisan gerrymandering cases – where a majority political party has disadvantaged the other in drawing new district lines – are now off-limits going forward. As a result of Baker v. Carr, Ohio voters amended the state constitution in 1967. 0000006592 00000 n
“The pendulum will swing again. If minorities are worried about the possibility of majority oppression, the remedy lies not in giving them added electoral weight but rather in settled constitutional procedures. The state legislatures were to fix the districts based on population. While this practice was struck down by the Supreme Court in its 1962 Baker v. Carr decision, at that time the Justices gave no precise indication of the reform they would require. 0000004271 00000 n
In Ohio, each county was entitled to have a legislator in the Ohio legislature before Baker v. Carr. The legislature had not redrawn district lines since 1901, and Memphis, Nashville, and other cities, contended this had short-changed them in the legislature’s funding decisions. Why would that be important?” Students will use their knowledge of the U.S. Supreme Court cases Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims to answer these questions. 0000019312 00000 n
; The state claimed redistricting was a political question and non-justiciable. Moreover, the Fourteenth Amendment stricture that all citizens are entitled to “equal protection of the laws” would seem to require that everyone be permitted to participate in the process whereby those laws are made. The goal of equal votes for equal citizens, far from being a radical departure in our political tradition, is consistent with this nation's efforts to extend a full franchise to all citizens. Ours is an urban age, with wealth increasingly concentrated in the cities and surburbs. If the logic of equal votes is applied, then back‐country legislative seats would in most cases be transferred to the growing suburbs. The best free civics materials from around the web in one monthly mailing. Now 87, he helped me understand what has been lost in light of Thursday’s ruling. Anyone still wondering what President Trump has accomplished need only look to the Supreme Court’s announcement last Thursday saying it is helpless to fix cases of partisan gerrymandering now. 0000009131 00000 n
And the continuance of democratic government itself requires that such rights be protected and guaranteed. The founders agreed that Delaware and Rhode Island should always be able to defend themselves in the Senate. Previously the courts had regarded partisan gerrymandering as a “political” matter outside the purview of the judiciary. 0000015316 00000 n
THE creation of districts of equal population would undoubtedly destroy what are now homogenous enclaves. The Court seems to be saying that even if a majority of the citizens are willing to dilute the value of their legislative vote they must be prevented from doing so. Another one is coming in 16 months. Most compelling, perhaps, is that the people of a state have on occasion agreed to permitting one of their legislative chambers to give an amplified voice to underpopulated areas. Such legislators must be able to talk the language of more than a single electoral group and have the skills to win an open fight against more‐than‐token opposition. Logic, theory and history can be brought to bear in defense of “one man, one vote." 0000002700 00000 n
Experience has shown that those who are excluded from the polls or who are underrepresented in legislative councils will find themselves having to obey laws that are highly discriminatory. Leaders in both chambers have promised to introduce resolutions for amending the Constitution that would permit one House in each state to be based on nonpopulation factors. There may be good reason for arguing that a bicameral legislature serves some useful purpose (although unicameral Nebraska has not been notable for rushing through hasty or illadvised statutes) . %PDF-1.5
%����
0000005508 00000 n
If it were proposed that the U.S. senate be abolished—after all, it is a far cry from “one man, one vote”—and that all national legislation be left to the House of Representatives the suspicion arises that such a move would arouse little enthusiasm in liberal circles. Yet this would take from the have‐nots and give to those who are already doing quite well. Michigan, in reapportioning its Senate last year, created 38 districts\ no one of which had less than 205,000 people nor more than 207,000. This affected numerous state legislatures that had not redistricted congressional … Some Tennesseans are advocating that now. Were the prosperous and populous to he given their arithmetical due, the odds are great that the flow of public funds to rural sections would come to a halt. This interactive guide to the U.S. Constitution provides the original text and an explanation of the meaning of each article and amendment. IF apportionment dominated the closing days of the 88th Congress, notice has been given that the debate will resume when our lawmakers convene in January. Under the old system, each county received one legislator. Even if majorities in Colorado and Michigan and California acted mistakenly, it may be argued that it is part of democracy that the people should be allowed to cosnmit their own errors—and then learn by experience and mend their ways in their own time. The House of Representatives rushed through a bill stripping the Federal courts of all jurisdiction over state apportionment cases. Yet if this is accomplished and an amendment is sent to the states, for ratification in 1965, then there will be the curious spectacle of malapportioned state legislatures voting for their own continuation. The United States Supreme Court heard the Baker v. Carr case in 1962. 0000007110 00000 n
By cementing Republican control of legislative districts, this overshadows even Bush v. Gore (2000) and Citizens United (2010) in its potential erosion of modern democracy. The amendment also established that each senator and representative would have approximately the same number of constituents, as ordered by the United States Supreme Court. The amendment created a thirty-three-seat state Senate and a ninety-nine seat state House. Students try to identify these in the Synthesis part of the worksheet. More to the point is the fact that rural America is indeed poorer, that it needs political leverage more than its metropolitan cousin. THE issue is the old one of majority rule versus individual rights, but with a new twist. It may come back when the Democrats have a majority on the court.”. If a Downstate Illinois farmer with an annual income of $2,711 deserves to be heard so does a Negro laundress in Chicago who also ends the year with $2,711. 0000002563 00000 n
0000027361 00000 n
Charles W. Baker, a Republican, was former mayor of Millington, and Democrat Joe C. Carr was Tennessee’s secretary of state with authority over elections. Case Summary of Baker v. Carr: A Tennessee resident brought suit against the Secretary of State claiming that the failure to redraw the legislative districts every ten years, as outlined in the state constitution, resulted in rural votes holding more votes than urban votes. 0000004012 00000 n
But logic alone is not the only guide in political life. . Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems; we are continuing to work to improve these archived versions. 0000004158 00000 n
0000002538 00000 n
Surely Negroes, Mexican‐Americans, the indigent aged, mothers supporting fatherless children, and the blind also stand in need of greater‐than‐average governmental help and protection. The failure to update legislative districts by current population had cemented the political clout of rural counties, especially in middle Tennessee. (5) There are indications that the voters—and not simply rural voters—are content with arrangements as they now stand; that they see nothing partieularly malapropos in malapportionment.