appeals court opinions

The court entered a final judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $35,667.42, and this appeal followed. Format: 11/06/2020.

Case alternatively asserts an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim.

County .

§ 20-12-119(c). Further, the record shows that the defendant promptly filed another motion to dismiss on the same ground when the case was transferred to the circuit court. 18 … Other than a change in the amount of late fees awarded and instructions regarding recalculating the prejudgment interest, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Joel Green Case appeals from his conviction for first-degree theft, asserting there is insufficient evidence to support the conviction. We do not address Case’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim.

(Judge Linda McGee), COA20-96 Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clinton County, Patrick McElyea (plea) and Henry W. Latham II (sentencing), Judges.

Box 61260Suite 1500Harrisburg, PA 17106, 601 Commonwealth Avenue Suite 1500 Harrisburg, PA 17120, 1515 Market Street Suite 1414 Philadelphia, PA 19102, © The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, Follow the Unified Judicial System on Twitter, Search, view and print court docket sheets, Securely pay fines, costs, and restitution, Electronically file documents with the courts, Opinion Announcing the Judgment of the Court, Commonwealth Court Prothonotary's Address, Office of Children & Families in the Courts.

Use the search boxes below to locate documents described above.

(Judge Christopher Brook), Court of Appeals Published Opinions Filed November 3, 2020, Court of Appeals Unpublished Opinions Filed November 3, 2020, Justice v. Deacon Jones Auto. Opinion by Bower, C.J. Reported opinions appearing on this website may not be the final, official version of the text of Appellate Court opinions/orders. The petitioners filed an affidavit stating that they had no knowledge concerning who made the markings on the decedent’s will. All Rights Reserved. OPINION HOLDS: Sufficient evidence supported Thomas’s murder conviction. Because the trial court properly interpreted the statute, we affirm the trial court’s decision.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Joseph P. Binkley, Jr. Authoring Judge: Judge J. Steven Stafford.

To view a PDF file you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader which is … AFFIRMED.

Therefore, the defendant did not waive the issue of insufficient service of process.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support Leachman’s conviction and his conviction is not contrary to the weight of the evidence. © 2020 Iowa Judicial Branch.

The parties executed a marital dissolution agreement (“the MDA”).

OPINION HOLDS: The appellants concede that they were not actually exposed to a communicable disease.

(11 pages).

Timothy Leachman appeals his conviction for first-degree burglary. The Wisconsin Court System protects individuals' rights, privileges and liberties, maintains the rule of law, and provides a forum for the resolution of disputes … Slip opinions are subject to change. Considered by Bower, C.J., and May and Ahlers, JJ. The petitioners appealed. Monsieur Shawnellias Burgess v. Bradford Hills HOA Et Al. Plaintiffs appealed to this Court, and we held that the Commissioner’s conclusions of law were deficient and vacated and remanded the case for further consideration. Prior to a trial on the merits, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the civil warrant premised on insufficient service of process. (9 pages). West Publishing Company publishes all cited opinions in the Pacific Reporter and Idaho Reports volumes. (4 pages). When the defendants refused to participate in mediation, the court held them in contempt. Appellant was injured in an automobile accident, and a jury found that an unknown motorist was 100% at fault and awarded damages in favor of Appellant. Because there are significant deficiencies in the trial court’s order, we vacate and remand for further proceedings. SENTENCES VACATED AND REMANDED.

Cassandra Doran appeals her convictions and sentence following guilty pleas to willful injury causing serious injury with a dangerous weapon and three counts of second-degree criminal mischief. The court did not err in instructing the jury on aiding and abetting, in denying Case’s request for a Franks hearing, or in denying the motion to suppress. Thomas did not preserve error on his claim that certain evidence amounted in improper prior-bad-acts evidence. We conclude the district court properly granted summary judgment to IMMC. The appellant’s brief significantly fails to comply with Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 27. Shortly thereafter, the defendant filed her second motion to dismiss the action based on insufficient service of process. Husband moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Christopher Michael Retman appeals from his conviction for first-degree theft. Search for opinions. Case Number . After a hearing at which both Husband and Wife testified, the Trial Court denied Wife’s motion.

AFFIRMED.

Face coverings are required in all courthouses. (Judge John Tyson), COA19-925 OPINION HOLDS: We affirm McKenery’s conviction, finding his plea was supported by a factual basis and counsel was not ineffective for allowing him to plead guilty and waive his right to file a motion in arrest of judgment. And even if sufficiently pled, the mother argues that the evidence of the grounds and the child’s best interest was less than clear and convincing. Authoring Judge . Having determined that the order granting the motion to quash was entered based upon the consent and agreement of both the plaintiff and Intervenors, we affirm. v. Elite RE Investments, LLC, et al.

He also contends the court erred by instructing the jury on aiding and abetting, in denying his request for a Franks hearing, and in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained upon execution of search warrants. Discerning no error, we affirm. To search for court opinions by word, name, etc., use the following form: Copyright © 2020 Maryland Judiciary. However, because the award of prejudgment interest is an equitable consideration within the discretion of the trial court, we decline to address Appellant’s issue concerning whether prejudgment interest is necessary and equitable in this case.
Originating Judge .

Chapter 50B - domestic violence. (Note this will open a new tab in your web browser). Opinion by Danilson, S.J. (Judge John Arrowood), COA19-1077 A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to her child. The trial court dismissed a contractor’s amended countercomplaint against a homeowner for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. P. 4(a). Accordingly, we find that any issues on appeal are waived and we dismiss the appeal.

The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint due to the plaintiff’s failure to comply with Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-26-121(a)(2)(E), arguing that the plaintiff had not provided them HIPAA compliant medical authorizations allowing them to receive medical records from the other providers being sent statutorily-required pre-suit notice. Judicial Branch Building and Courthouse Tours, State Court Administration Organizational Chart, Archived Supreme Court Opinions Prior to 2017, Archived Court of Appeals Opinions from 1/10/2018 to 2/7/2018, Archived Court of Appeals Opinions from 2017 and Earlier, COVID-19 Resources for Children's Justice, Submission of CLE Programs by CLE Sponsors, Complaint Against a Non-Lawyer Who is Practicing Law, Commission on Unauthorized Practice of Law, Information for Current Shorthand Reporters, How to Become a Qualified Court Interpreter in Iowa, Information for Current Court Interpreters, Judicial Branch Building Media Interviews. Considered by Bower, C.J., and May and Ahlers, JJ. indictment, alternative theories of guilt, essential elements, jury instructions, fatal variance, abstract theory of guilt, particularity, communicating threats, conditional threat, lawful authority, jury venire composition; showing required to establish unrepresentative venire; timeliness of motion to quash jury venire; renewal of motions and objections denied outside the presence of the jury to preserve issues for appellate review. Opinion by Danilson, S.J. Opinions scheduled for release. Follow @SupremeCtofPA on Twitter for the latest available dispositional orders and opinions. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Paul D. Scott, Judge. (5 pages). The circuit court denied the motion ruling that, although service of process was insufficient, the defendant waived the issue by making a general appearance in general sessions court. Loans Yes v. Kroger Limited Partnership I Et Al. During the scheduling conference, the trial court directed the plaintiffs to submit testimony and other evidence concerning the proceeds of the life insurance policy.

OPINION HOLDS: Because there is substantial evidence Retman knew or reasonably should have known the items possessed were stolen, we affirm. DISCLAIMER: Opinions posted here are for informational purposes only.

A mother and father appeal the juvenile court’s decision to terminate their parental rights based on six statutory grounds.

Servs. Court of Appeals Opinions; Case No. And: Format: 11/06/2020. Wife appeals, arguing among other things that she was coerced into signing the MDA. Wife filed for divorce in Tennessee in May of 2019 and personally served Husband in Connecticut.

Official copies of opinions are … 18-1086 View Summary for Case No. Following a bench trial, the Tennessee Claims Commissioner concluded that the Plaintiffs failed to establish that the State’s negligence was the proximate cause of their son’s injuries.

The motion to recuse was denied, and this accelerated interlocutory appeal followed.

Babus Conrad appeals the district court’s entry of judgment and sentence order, contending the district court erred when it required him to pay restitution without first assessing his reasonable ability to pay. We affirm the Commissioner’s holding that Plaintiffs failed to establish that the negligence of the Inn was the proximate cause of their son’s injuries. (Judge Hunter Murphy), COA20-107 Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Frank G. Clement, Jr. Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Patricia Head Moskal, Trial Court Judge: Judge Franklin L. Russell, Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Louis W. Oliver, Trial Court Judge: Judge Barry R. Tidwell, Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford, Trial Court Judge: Commissioner James A. Hamilton, III, Authoring Judge: Chief Judge D. Michael Swiney, Trial Court Judge: Judge Darrell Scarlett. 18-1363: State of Iowa v. Babus L. Conrad Filed Sep 23, 2020 View Opinion No.