0000003934 00000 n
Upon the unanimous adoption of the committee±s report by the Law School faculty, it became the Law School±s official admissions policy. 0000065493 00000 n
0000031107 00000 n
h�b```f``:���� ��A��X��,�9������/�_��]P�Fj�x�RA�� h``6q���������H��X$����C�������~6:0��HU�:�0�1�q'� endstream
endobj
startxref
See Regents of Univ. 02–241. 0000002715 00000 n
trailer
<<
/Size 165
/Info 139 0 R
/Root 145 0 R
/Prev 67716
/ID[<5578ae8d3d72b5d463dc4c9193a068f4><9c42e7cf3e5ca5520918a36f66876b9e>]
>>
startxref
0
%%EOF
145 0 obj
<<
/Type /Catalog
/Pages 142 0 R
/Metadata 140 0 R
/StructTreeRoot 146 0 R
/OpenAction [ 147 0 R /XYZ null null null ]
/PageMode /UseNone
>>
endobj
146 0 obj
<<
/Type /StructTreeRoot
/ParentTree 111 0 R
/ParentTreeNextKey 13
/K [ 34 0 R ]
>>
endobj
163 0 obj
<< /S 84 /T 134 /C 187 /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 164 0 R >>
stream
5 0 obj 0000063487 00000 n
%PDF-1.6
%����
0000069871 00000 n
0000070009 00000 n
8 0 obj 0000027532 00000 n
is unlawful.” That's what is euphemistically called "affirmative action" in the name of "diversity." certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit No. %PDF-1.2
%����
0000063565 00000 n
0000004537 00000 n
0000002344 00000 n
The Background of Grutter v. Bollinger (00:00 to 3:55) 1. Who was Barbara Grutter and what did she attempt to do in 1996? BARBARA GRUTTER, Petitioner, v. LEE BOLLINGER, JEFFREY LEHMAN, DENNIS SHIELDS, and the BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, et al., Respondents, and KIMBERLY JAMES, et al., Respondents. 0000063510 00000 n
trailer
<<
/Size 2003
/Info 1939 0 R
/Root 1961 0 R
/Prev 947120
/ID[<9e4ae38fe78b673550b9f00170e821e0>]
>>
startxref
0
%%EOF
1961 0 obj
<<
/Type /Catalog
/Pages 1928 0 R
/Metadata 1927 0 R
/JT 1938 0 R
/StructTreeRoot 1962 0 R
/Lang (en-US)
/MarkInfo << /Marked true >>
>>
endobj
1962 0 obj
<<
/Type /StructTreeRoot
/ParentTree 407 0 R
/ParentTreeNextKey 95
/K [ 506 0 R 507 0 R 508 0 R 582 0 R 885 0 R 956 0 R 990 0 R 1525 0 R
1822 0 R ]
/ClassMap 409 0 R
>>
endobj
2001 0 obj
<< /S 2905 /C 3254 /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 2002 0 R >>
stream
0000062531 00000 n
0000060478 00000 n
For the reasons set forth in Grutter v. Bollinger, post, at 15– 21, the Court has today rejected petitioners’ argument that diversity cannot constitute a compelling state interest. 0000068425 00000 n
<> stream trailer
<<
/Size 1523
/Info 1465 0 R
/Root 1481 0 R
/Prev 840482
/ID[<784b8338462017f7dd1453158aba00b5><759e3422245b47450ab344687dc14ac4>]
>>
startxref
0
%%EOF
1481 0 obj
<<
/Type /Catalog
/Pages 1454 0 R
/Metadata 1453 0 R
/JT 1464 0 R
/StructTreeRoot 1482 0 R
/Lang (en-US)
/MarkInfo << /Marked true >>
>>
endobj
1482 0 obj
<<
/Type /StructTreeRoot
/ParentTree 333 0 R
/ParentTreeNextKey 68
/K [ 405 0 R 406 0 R 461 0 R 984 0 R 1041 0 R 1062 0 R 1079 0 R 1190 0 R
1307 0 R ]
/ClassMap 335 0 R
>>
endobj
1521 0 obj
<< /S 2040 /C 2397 /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 1522 0 R >>
stream
0000063542 00000 n
0000029267 00000 n
0000061593 00000 n
0000062554 00000 n
1960 0 obj
<<
/Linearized 1
/O 1963
/H [ 1573 1166 ]
/L 986452
/E 71137
/N 95
/T 947132
>>
endobj
xref
1960 43
0000000016 00000 n
H��Wmo�F��_��$���K@ `)��C/l\r8���v�,'M~}g�gi)�\ZG����<3� e��8�%�v5�W�����G�[���&�W���n�u5���߮��v���j���^^����d���.Vb�D@z�
��%��}����^���o���ƴ�1�Z|����ˇU5[~hNT}ۜP^��?nn��,�19_����5��ڼ�'��}^�����خ������ms�Y�sB����Ս{ss�PQ�ʖ�ߏ������H�}�[o>U��9�/y�WiZ}�"�t��'�rx"�u��ᡔ�G�3��ʮ�ʞ3O�:�T�?�6�?�"����'�t�x�hW�R�'��T�]����3ZXf�rW�+!Uk:�K��z�i��=T�����X5cf��luR���D���F՛�׆�z�@Y���}��!S��xu�ݬ����F����g��ۆv�j\>�Z���%��\x䤃��:ˡ�. 0000001733 00000 n
In 2003, the Supreme Court decided the landmark cases of Gratz v.Bollinger and Grutter v.Bollinger.Several years after CIR’s historic victory in the Fifth Circuit, Hopwood v.Texas, which struck down the use of racial preferences in all states in the Fifth Circuit, the Sixth Circuit court of Appeals upheld the use of the racial preferences program at the University of Michigan. Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, was a landmark case of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning affirmative action in student admissions. 0000027555 00000 n
0000064514 00000 n
0000001504 00000 n
h��A�ZCʹ0Tԙ���Csnj��=3�ң��C�Zpf��!��xO-$�N��P�G���{�
!,���#�Myrt����G�����yru]=���d"�b�5O����_�:͓��<9��8�"O�F���l�����c��wOc�W��|>�>����b\��E1~sx?�3��>=M�G. 0000003740 00000 n
0000065470 00000 n
0000028234 00000 n
Grutter v. Bollinger presented the question, in the words of Associate Justice Sandra Day O‟Connor of “whether the use of race as a factor in student admissions by the University of Michigan Law School . Title U.S. Reports: Grutter v. Bollinger et al., 539 U.S. 306 (2003). 0000062345 00000 n
0000003154 00000 n
H��W�r�F|�WT�aܐ �e;1��Mx�q�2ڇ&�$ۂ ��"��fu7��fCⅪ�ʬ����|Z7�����4�B���e���qry���M5���j>����i��#��ߛWa�~@�,r���x(o�O. . H�lTiPTW�M�(4��=|�5@�eF"& ���� g�p�
� A���:O1�f�0�Nb��|��)Ԅ���� 0000001312 00000 n
0000065521 00000 n
endstream
endobj
344 0 obj
<>/Metadata 9 0 R/Pages 341 0 R/StructTreeRoot 15 0 R/Type/Catalog>>
endobj
345 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 612.0 792.0]/Type/Page>>
endobj
346 0 obj
<>stream
0000010478 00000 n
0000001044 00000 n
0000000937 00000 n
0
h�bbd```b``N�� ��DrM�5��"��,A`v�\&�d5��^~0�+X���fˀeK�"�6��H3�\"� IF�2۰D�y�U��H�v��)`�d�J��`�{A��&�dl�b��D)/$���320>�e`&��� N�
0000061345 00000 n
This case requires us to decide whether the use of race as a factor in student admissions by the University of Michigan Law School (Law School) is unlawful. 0000002739 00000 n
See Regents of Univ. 0000064574 00000 n
T�AGGG�2� ӌ�(|fc(mbu��
촱1*l4��� �G�+)Q�. Syllabus. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. 0000047998 00000 n
Statement of the Facts: Each year, the University of Michigan Law School receives approximately 3500 applications for 350 available seats. 0000028246 00000 n
in Support of Petr., Grutter v. Bollinger, 123 S. Ct. 2325 (2003). 0000061805 00000 n
0000070337 00000 n
�;�����fS�`�C�C����k2��50-�㯨u��W���k�ڎTf`���E��Cg{�Z�%u�*�R���-�U�0�Z�
TC^]*���>�C���q���@bu(���%���*��q4��{�G��?���K� ۖ�m+0R�K�b"��sA�0� �|�Xr�/K�A�.�3�A��ޯ. is unlawful.” To achieve that goal, the Law School admissions officials considered many factors beyond GPA and LSAT score. 0000062593 00000 n
�4w`ݿ@���-�->�m*��{�7��?�>9 Barbara Grutter was a 43 year-old single white mother who wanted to attend the University of Michigan Law School. 0000002957 00000 n
0000064597 00000 n
Br. 0000002768 00000 n
0000001573 00000 n
�I�< 0000067477 00000 n
17. 0000030393 00000 n
2 GRUTTER v. BOLLINGER Opinion of the Court body diversity complied with this Court±s most recent ruling on the use of race in university admissions. The second case, Gratz v. Bollinger, concerned the admissions policy of the University’s Literature, Science and Arts School (LSA). Texas A&M University at College Station has undertaken a multi-pronged effort to enroll more minority students without considering race in admissions decisions. %PDF-1.4
%����
GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER (02-241) 539 U.S. 306 (2003) 288 F.3d 732, affirmed. ----- ♦ ----- On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court … 02–241. 0000003540 00000 n
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 US 306 - Supreme Court 2003 - Google Scholar v. United States, E.g. h��Zko���+�1A�r����ֱo��m ~Pm�*K�� ���g�-ҔD)m�����̜���q��f��d�ti��gǴ�8{��90gS��=����� ��
�b�Z��F��t�յLxM���*$��I�- �����B�Hzsn���슜,�{1v�Tf��2k��(����
�&�0ɮ�� This admissions program automatically awarded 20 points out of the 100 necessary for acceptance to … 0000001290 00000 n
0000007540 00000 n
382 0 obj
<>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<97D4058B5193634EA12C7A0722D046E1>]/Index[343 76]/Info 342 0 R/Length 163/Prev 174495/Root 344 0 R/Size 419/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream
� ��%�d�ge�z�����*�L0](�(8.�+\&� �=lj�$�$Fɘ���^�w��&ݟح�����������l����I�s�;$8�:z^�)�C���'?9�O�R;��Ԉ�w)UK���e�y�Ӥ�VOk����g�C�#����"tѸ�s�&�ٹ��s�:M'���,��YZ�t�W��H�� ��Gbp�ETW�9**[�Dp��F-{�"UI��U���j��L2�XiV��,��e���E��d6�s�U�Z����8�5�0|�FYJ�c���!j���jC����������mt%��A"�}�n����zhރ��� 0000004239 00000 n
of Cal. Contributor Names O'Connor, Sandra Day (Judge) 0000069986 00000 n
0000066567 00000 n
0000028223 00000 n
0000067500 00000 n
0000002673 00000 n
0000061477 00000 n
0000070786 00000 n
Affirmative Action in Higher Education After Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger. 0000029915 00000 n
H�b```f``Se`c``�fd@ AV�ꀦ{l+�7L(���B��L�h&G��~���qر$4=r�_е!�A�B��U�8�����M�x�" �)�r�I����
J��Wx�0%5�8r3�``�� hő���y����(���\��٢1�a����R��;n]�M���28n�]i��ط`�5�oX��2~s(�����1��l*�[��-�8��Q�hQ�pB%�Z�IpX��ᴡE��`֠abcefd����WVRPU$���[�Ϩgh`TS�������Y_[
Sc�Ӯ����T��W�o�����M�u��y������Yks�U��1��E�����Ic�"!����;�g�G��K������swg�{����k�����c{�"!~dDxcXOh�o��� ?ŀ���!=a���A���z'*��?