Otherworldly. They won't be able to see your review if you only submit your rating. It is a horror movie, but in a subtly different way. Directed by: Peter Fonda: Release date: 1973: Runtime: 86 minutes: RYM Rating: 3.25 / 5.0. from ... Don't use this space to complain about the average rating, chart position, genre voting, others' reviews or ratings, or errors on the page. It involves a group of young researchers who are projected forwards into time 56 years at a super-secret government lab in a remote area of Idaho. watch it and amaze your friends by regaling them with tales of its existence. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Idaho Transfer at Amazon.com. and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango. It seems a plot add-on to Make A Statement About The Righteousness of the Youth Movement. However, there are some things the movie gets right. A harsh/comic ending obscures Fonda's intentions w/o diminishing his vision. The spare or minimalist quality that others mentioned is true, and I didn't mind it. what’s awesome about this movie is that if you say the phrase “Peter Fonda time travel movie 1973,” the movie that immediately pops into your head is 100% EXACTLY the movie that this is. For my dissertation. Ending is a knockout. To put the story into context, Peter Fonda's IDAHO TRANSFER is essentially a tale about intellectual free spirits(.."cerebral" hippies, I guess you could say)who use a time traveling device to enter the future, studying an area where no life seems to exist due perhaps to a nuclear holocaust. Their landing zone/base camp is in a desolate lava field some miles away; and in this future, there's no apparent sign of human civilization to be found, as an apparent catastrophe has wiped it out! A product of its time, but still interesting. They find that some type of 'eco-crisis' disaster has de-populated the area around their lab (in rural Idaho) and, by implication, the nation or maybe the world. Most of the them are unprofessionals; the only recognizable face onscreen is that of a too-briefly-utilized Keith Carradine. No-budget effects and indifferent acting ultimately sink this Harlan Ellisonesque tale of time-travel into a desolate future where a mysterious apocalypse has wiped out most of humanity, but it's still offbeat enough to merit attention. For instance, the restriction of time travel to young people. Shot at Idaho's Craters of the Moon, the pic follows a group of under-30 scientific researchers who have invented a time machine contraption that has penetrated a pocket of time in post-apocalyptic 2049. Her verbal cadence is detached and spooky. A group of young people transfer to a post-apocalyptic future with the intention of restarting civilisation in a sort of commune. Coming Soon. I too, *love* this movie and have seen it quite a few times. Please click the link below to receive your verification email. Not too bad actually. "A group of research scientists based at an Idaho facility discovers a means to travel forward in time, whilst remaining at the same locale. Well after 3 hits still it makes little or no sense, After watching it about 1/3 into the movie the 2 girls come across a hiker and his girlfriend, when he is getting out of the car he whispers something to one of the girls, It had nothing to do with anything in the movie. In fact, the running time (just under 90 mins) could easily have been 30 mins or 300 mins; it wouldn't have mattered. Peter Fonda's Sci-Fi adventure has a good premise, but the plot fails to capitalise on it due to the fact that it's completely pointless.